| Participatory Development |
|
|
| Participatory Development/Community Participation In order to emphasize participatory development planning approach, four Workshops and a Technology Transfer Seminar were held within the Cagayan River basin to date. First Workshop in Tuguegarao In order to introduce the Study to local people and local government officials, the First Workshop was held in Tuguegarao on March 28, 2000. Total number of attendees for the Workshop was 61 persons including Provincial Governors and/or those representatives, Municipality Mayors, DPWH Region 2 Regional Director and its counterpart personnel, and the Study Team members. |
||
|
|
The first part of the Workshop
was the introduction of the Study to explain the Inception Report to the
attendees. The second part covered the participation and problem analyses
using the Project Cycle Management (PCM) method. The participation analysis
aimed to clarify participants on the flood control works in terms of their
tasks and duties. The problem analysis was to clarify problems being encountered
in flood control and river management.
|
|||
|
|||
| Second
Workshop in Tuguegarao, Santiago and Bayombong The Second Workshop was held during September 5 to 7, 2000 at three different places of Tuguegarao, Santiago and Bayombong with the same agenda. The purpose of the Second Workshop was to gather opinions of the participants in the different areas on 1) needs/demands/requirements for the river basin development, 2) first priority sector/requirement in the basin development, and 3) problems hampering the implementation of the first priority requirement. Before getting the opinions, an example of the basin development in Indonesia and an outline of the 1987 Master Plan for the Cagayan River basin were presented by the Study Team for participants’ reference. |
|||
|
|||
| The conclusions of the Workshop are; that flood control is the first priority in all three areas, and, problems/constraints identified are financial constraints, inadequate technology, land acquisition problems, political intervention, inadequate information/education/campaign, lack of comprehensive plan, inaccurate and inadequate data for planning, hence no project implementation. | |||
|
|||
| Third
Workshop in Tuguegarao The Third Workshop was held on October 3, 2000 at Tuguegarao for the purpose of getting the opinions on problems in implementing the priority projects and the corresponding solutions to cope with the problems. Participants came from three areas where the Second Workshop was held. Issues being encountered in the ongoing river projects in the Philippines were presented by the Study Team, followed by an introduction of the river management in Japan by JICA expert of DPWH. The solutions identified are administrative support, sharing of resources, good governance, transfer of technology, formulation of appropriate plans, advocacy, institutional development and infrastructure support. |
|||
|
|||
|
Fourth
Workshop in Tuguegarao General objectives Specific objectives:
The Project Director Philip F. Meñez, PMO-MFCDP II |
|||
First Technology Transfer Seminar The First Technology Transfer Seminar for the Feasibility Study of the Flood Control Project for the Lower Cagayan River was conducted at Crown Lodge in Tuguegarao City on May 25, 2001.
Mrs. Elisa Carodan, PPDO - Cagayan Province 1. "Master Plan Formulation for the Cagayan River Basin" by Mr. Sato (10:15-11:00) 2. "Purpose of Watershed Conservation" by Mr. Hino (11:00-12:00) 3. "Land Use Planning" by Mr. Takashi Kurauchi, 4. "River Morphology and River Planning" by Mr. Takayuki Nobe, During the seminar, active discussions were made on the topics covered. Features of the discussion are as follows: 1) WATERSHED PRESERVATION: A participant noted that he was glad to listen to the topic on watershed preservation and reforestation, as these topics were not included in the 1987 Master Plan. 2) MASTER PLAN FORMULATION: A question was raised regarding the method of integrating various sectoral plans into our Master Plan Study. Mr. Sato clarified that the sectoral studies on watershed management, irrigation and flood controls are integrated into one comprehensive plan (MP) through alternative studies on combination of sectoral plans. 3) NECESSITY TO CONDUCT FEASIBILITY STUDY: Another participant raised a question whether it is necessarily to conduct a feasibility study, despite the fact that projects are already considered as prioritized project in 1987 Master Plan. The Study Team explained that economic and financial evaluations on prioritized projects are only preliminary studied during Master Plan stage and in order to confirm the feasibility of the projects, the feasibility study should be conducted. NEDA Region II staff also further explained to the participants that feasibility study is mandatory in requesting overseas funding for a project. 4) WATERSHED MANAGEMENT METHODS: Regarding watershed management, a participant raised a question on comparative advantage of sabo dam construction and reforestation. Mr. Hino pointed out the fact that reforestation will take time to mitigate sedimentation, as trees would require years to grow before their effect become visible. Immediate measures can be made by sabo dam construction. Moreover, Mr. Hino explained that there exist many sabo dams within Magat river basin, as Magat river basin is one of the most important tributary of Cagayan river with heavy sedimentation problem. 5) COST SHARING BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS: Regarding cost sharing of local government, a question was raised whether cost sharing alternatives would also be recommended once this study is completed. Mr. Sato explained that government cost sharing includes land acquisition costs for right-of-way and resettlement areas, which normally includes LGU funds as well. Alternative measures of cost sharing will not be recommended by the Study Team, he noted. 6) IMPLEMENTATION SCHEME: Mr. Sato then asked participant from Tuguegarao whether they would prefer force account system or contract system for implementing the proposed project. The participant answered that he prefers contract system, since there is a security measure, i.e. contractor, if anything goes wrong during and after the Construction. 7) TECHNOLOGY EXCHANGE: A participant requested that next technology transfer seminar should compare technology of Japan and the Philippines. In response to the request, Mr. Sato agreed on the point raised and consider to have the seminar as "technology exchange seminar." |
| Home Latest News JICA The Study Study Progress Transfer of Technology |